So who should win the All - Euroleague awards?
Today is an important day in the Euroleague season, as the Play-in tournament starts with a duel between PAO and Monaco for the 7th seed, followed by Barcelona-Crvena Zvezda. We also got the announcement of the Coach of the Year, given, deservedly so, to Pedro Martinez. Not only did he overrachieve with Valencia, a team which is returned to the Euroleague this season, he did so by playing a very entertaining brand of basketball. This prompted me to think about the rest of the Euroleague awards.
PG: Sylvain Francisco
SG: Jean Montero
SF: Elijah Bryant
PF: Sasha Vezenkov
C: Nikolas Milutinov
PG: Facundo Campazzo
SG: Kendrick Nunn
SF: Talen Horton-Tucker
PF: Nicollo Melli
C: Moses Wright
By some split haired decisions players like Wade Baldwin (could be in the place of Nunn or Campazzo), Jordan Nwora, Dan Oturu (could even make a case that he should be on the first team), Kameron Taylor, Tyler Dorsey, Alpha Diallo or Trey Lyles did not make the teams.
Euroleague MVP:
I am between Sasha Vezenkov, Elijah Bryant and Sylvain Francisco. All of them have been excellent. Vezenkov has the priviliege of being in the 1st seed, and has done his usual business (elite efficiency, lots of scoring, rebounding) while also getting the Alphonso Ford award. Bryant has taken an impressive leap forwards under Itoudis, being a primary ball handler at times, being almost at the 50-40-90 club, while having great numbers in rebounds or assists. Francisco has lead Zalgiris to a surprising 5th place, with a team that does not have a very large budget. He has become much more consistent and efficient when compared to his stint in Manresa, Munich or last season. I think anyone out of these 3 would deserve it and has made the merit to win it. An argument against Vezenkov is that he is in a stacked team, where players like Dorsey, Fournier and especially Milutinov have outshone him, while someone could argue that Bryant and Francisco are alpha dogs in teams that did not finish in the top 4. While they did a lot of "carrying", their statistical output benefits from the fact that they do not have to share the ball as much. In that regard, Francisco is much more of a "leader" than Bryant, as Zalgiris are very dependant on the French PG. In the end, I think I would pick Bryant, as I feel like Francisco is in a team where he is too much of a first option, while Vezenkov plays in a team which is too stacked, with Bryant being in a middle ground. Hapoel finished 6th, (Zalgiris 5th, Olympiacos 1st), however despite their seeding not being spectacular, it reinforces how important Bryant was for Itoudis, as the Tel Aviv side lost 4/4 games where Bryant was not available, going 23-11 with him and 0-4 without him.
Comments
Post a Comment